|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit Sharing PlansRetirement plan solutions for small businessesIn GeneralThere are two basic categories of qualified retirement plans available: defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Both profit sharing and money purchase plans are types of defined contribution plans. Profit Sharing PlansProfit sharing plans offer both design flexibility and discretion as to making contributions. Company contributions are determined by the plan sponsor and can be allocated in a number of ways. If the company makes little or no profit that year, no contribution is required, although low profits don’t restrict the contribution level. A profit sharing plan can include an option allowing the company to make contributions even if the company has no profit. Profit sharing contributions are allocated to employees based on compensation. An employer’s maximum deduction is limited to 25% of the annual compensation paid to eligible employees. (The individual participant limits applied to all defined contribution plans are the lesser of 100% of compensation or $42,000.) Most small business owners are concerned about retirement, both for themselves and for their employees. The question isn’t whether or not to implement a retirement plan. The two most important issues are what type of plan you should start with and what are the considerations for choosing the right plan. A profit sharing plan is often a good place for a small business to start. Salary RatioThe salary ratio method is designed to allocate employer contributions to all participants on a uniform basis. For example, if one employee receives a 10% of pay contribution, all eligible employees would be allocated 10% of compensation as their share of the contribution. A profit sharing plan with a salary ratio formula is similar to a Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) plan, but may be more attractive than a SEP plan in situations where an employer: (a) does not wish to cover certain part-time employees (b) wants to make employer contributions subject to a vesting schedule or, (c) wants more control over the assets. Social Security IntegrationThis allocation method provides an additional contribution based on compensation in excess of some specified amount, frequently the Social Security wage base. This favors higher paid employees by providing an additional share of the contribution to be based on compensation that would otherwise accrue minimal Social Security benefits or none at all. Social Security integration should be used to provide larger proportionate contributions to higher paid employees that are the same age or younger than other employees. Age-WeightedThe age-weighted method allocates contributions based on both the age and compensation of eligible employees. It is similar to a defined benefit pension plan, only with discretionary contributions. Since the participant’s age, or length of time until retirement, is factored into the allocation formula, older participants receive a larger proportionate share of the contribution. This can be advantageous in situations where the key employees are significantly older than the other employees. Although this type of plan is available to any size company, age-weighted plans are designed to be top-heavy and are especially well-suited for small business and professional practices. In certain situations, an age-weighted plan design works extremely well, but some employees with the same salaries may receive different allocations, based on age. In addition, an older non-principal employee may receive a larger share than a younger principal.
This chart is an example of the available allocation methods in a profit sharing plan. ComparabilityThe comparability, or cross-tested, allocation method allows the employer to divide the employees into different classifications for purposes of allocating the contribution. If non-discrimination requirements are met, a larger share of the company’s contribution may be made on behalf of those employees to whom the employer wishes to provide a more significant benefit. The right plan design is determined by many factors, including: Who is the plan intended to benefit? How many employees? Full or part time? What is the employee turnover rate? Is the company growing? What are administrative costs or funding limitations? The answers help determine which allocation formula is most appropriate. Non-discrimination testing, like an age-weighted plan, is based on projected benefits at retirement, similar to a defined benefit plan. If the aggregated age of the preferred class is higher than the other classes, the allocation of current dollars can be skewed proportionately toward the older group. This type of plan involves complicated calculations and may require actuarial consulting, but it is still less expensive and more flexible than a defined benefit plan. This plan may be an appropriate design in a situation where a business wants to favor older or highly paid participants. These plans may establish several “class” designations of employees, e.g., principals would be in the first group, officers in the second group and all other employees in the third group. Frequently Asked Questions About Profit Sharing PlansQ. Can a profit sharing plan be combined with a 401(k) plan? Q. What are the costs of implementing and maintaining a profit sharing plan? Q. Can an IRA be rolled into a profit sharing plan? Q. Do all employees have to be included in a plan? Q. What is the difference between a profit sharing plan and a SEP plan? Q. What are the administrative requirements? For more information or to open a profit sharing plan, please contact your financial advisor today. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mutual Fund, Annuities and UIT Disclosures
Privacy Notice | SEC Order Execution/Routing Disclosure | Site Map © 2008 Raymond James Financial, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||